차량과태료 등 인수청구권
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including virtual numbers) and the whole arguments, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the defendant on Nov. 28, 2001 by filing a judgment of the Seoul Central District Court on Dec. 14, 2009 to transfer the entire business of the plaintiff, including DDama Roster and E-Poter cargo (hereinafter referred to as the "motor vehicle of this case"), to the defendant around Nov. 28, 2001. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23440, Nov. 28, 2001; Presidential Decree No. 22650, Nov. 28, 2001 to May 6, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22650, Dec. 14, 2009; Presidential Decree No. 22501, Feb. 16, 201>
The Plaintiff sought a payment of KRW 5,526,650, including the amount equivalent to the fine for negligence and consolation money, from the Defendant’s assertion that the Plaintiff incurred losses due to delay in the transfer of ownership, but in light of the fact that the Plaintiff clearly states that there was no intention to pay the fine for negligence in the course of the instant pleading, the Plaintiff suffered real property losses on the ground that the administrative fine was imposed.
The plaintiff's assertion cannot be accepted since it cannot be deemed that it was suffering from mental suffering.
(A) The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed on the ground that it has no reason to do so.