2. Although the Defendant made a confession and reflect on the instant crime, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing the female sex, and it is necessary to keep the business owner who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments from spreading and establish a sound sexual culture. In full view of the following: (a) the method and period of the instant crime; (b) the amount of gains acquired from the instant crime; (c) the Defendant’s age, family environment before and after the instant crime; and (d) the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.