1. On April 1, 2013, from around 04:00 to around 05:30, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by having the customers, who were eating in the said restaurant, drinked a mixed alcoholic beverage, and bring about a marb to E who is an employee, “Is any string, frier, fluor,” and neglecting the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. Around 06:06 on April 1, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s chests at one time on the ground that the victim C(53 years of age) reported to the police at the places indicated in the above paragraph (1), and on the ground that the victim C(53 years of age) reported to the police, and assaulted the victim’s chests at one time on the victim’s left side with the damaged floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements (victims) to E and C;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.