When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a de facto marital relationship living together with the victim C (49 years of age, women) for five years.

On June 11, 2015, from around 22:00 to 01:00 on June 12, 2015, the Defendant committed assault against the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s cell phone Do, and 305, the Defendant: (a) the victim suspected of causing another female from the Defendant’s cell phone d and 305 of the same month; (b) the Defendant took the scam of the Defendant’s cell phone d and scam; (c) scam the victim’s head d and scam; (d) the victim continued to go out of the bar; and (e) the victim was faced with the wall by cutting off the victim’s head scam with the wall; and (e) the head scam by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. After issuing a summary order on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the amount of the summary order issued shall be reduced partly by taking into account the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.