However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The defendant, on July 2014, was in use as a D (4.9 tons) fishery permit for coastal nets and a fish farm management vessel without a fishery permit, among the fishing vessels owned C owned by C, to sell a fishing vessel owned by C from a debtor who bears the obligation to return a loan to another person and to settle his/her obligation with the proceeds therefrom, and was in use as a fish farm management vessel without a fishery permit.

E (4.99 tons) was delegated with the authority to sell the E.

On April 2015, the Defendant, upon authorization from H, intended to sell the above D (shore self-help net, 4.99 tons) which was delegated by C in order to substitute build a new vessel with a fishery permit (a method of closing out old vessels with a fishery permit and building a new vessel succeeding to a fishery permit) to the above G. However, the above D intended to sell it to the above G, with the knowledge of the fact that G operating the F was to purchase a vessel with a fishery permit, which was delegated by C. However, the aforementioned D intended to sell it to any other person by delivering the vessel certificate, permit, and license, as if it was a coastal D, which had not been used as a fish farm management vessel in the above G, even though it was located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Busan, and did not pay repair costs, making it impossible to remove it from the above G, thereby making it impossible for the said G to take it out.

On April 29, 2015, the Defendant handed over a fishery permit without a fishery permit to G on April 29, 2015, and issued a certificate of ship and fishery permit as if the distribution was D, and caused G to prepare a certificate of sale of a fishing vessel with the content that C sells D above D in KRW 50 million to H. When requesting replacement, the Defendant requested H of the vessel purchaser who believed D to have been abolished at the time of the construction of the replacement, made H an application for cancellation of the registration of the fishing vessel at the old-gu public service center located in 1101 as of November 30, 2015, and on the same day, knew of such fact, the Defendant made a public official of the Changjin-si Office enter the fact of mistake in the electronic records identical to the original register of the fishing vessel, a process deed.

2...