업무정지처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Circumstances and details of the disposition;
A. From August 1, 1988 to September 30, 2010, the Plaintiff retired from office as a Air Force official officer and served in Company B from office from October 1, 2010, and is a construction engineer who acquired the qualification as a construction engineer on June 21, 1993, as a construction safety engineer on December 26, 1995, as a construction engineer on November 19, 201, as a construction engineer on December 23, 201, and as a construction engineer on December 23, 201.
B. On September 2017, the Government Government Government Government Government Policy Coordination Coordination Monitoring Group implemented a Government Joint Regulation as to whether the construction engineer retired from a public institution or an administrative agency was false or false.
As a result, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport asked the Air Force Headquarters to which the plaintiff belonged to confirm whether the plaintiff had made a false report on the plaintiff's part of his career.
Serial 1 D New Construction Work (department) reported on July 5, 2002 to December 31, 2003 / Where the results of the construction supervision agency (department) reported on October 27, 201 to December 31, 2010 / Where the results of the management supervision agency (department) reported on December 31, 205 / Where the F New Construction Work was reported on October 3, 201 to 0. 0. 1: from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005; / Where the results of the management supervision and supervision (department) reported on October 3, 2004 to 1. 0. 1:00 to December 31, 2005 to 3. 0. 1:06: 1:00 to 3. 1:5. 205. 1. 25. 201
On April 27, 2018, the Air Force Headquarters confirms that the seven participation experience as listed below is different from the fact and deleted it to the C Association.