A Imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months for a crime of 1st ruling, 1 year and 4 months for a crime of 2th ruling.

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment on December 5, 2008 by the Seoul High Court for the violation of the Narcotics Control Act and the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, etc. on January 8, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Suwon Detention House on January 8, 201. On July 12, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to one year by the Jeonju District Court for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (competence) and was released by the Jeonju Prison on September 11, 2013 during the execution of the sentence.

9.24. The judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant

B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on October 23, 2008, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Suwon Detention Center on March 12, 2009. On March 11, 2011, upon being sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.") in the Support for Mansan Station, the judgment became final and conclusive on October 25, 2012, and on July 26, 2012, the judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on August 31, 2012, and on November 13, 2014, with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Act").

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants (Violation of the Law by Attorney Park Jong-soo) were working as a “E” under the title of reporting to an investigation agency with respect to a narcotics case in Seoul and Incheon. On January 1, 2012, Defendant A was aware of it in the early police officer.

F From F, “A East G is going to China and intends to return to China for her father's status, a warrant of arrest has been issued as a drug case, and it is registered in the customs boarding notification system, and thus it is impossible to enter the Republic of Korea. Therefore, whether it can help it enter the Incheon Airport without permission or not.

“After receiving the inquiry,” the Defendant B sent the above purport by posting a telephone to Defendant B, who was called “E,” which was known to the general public, and Defendant B sent the said intent from Defendant A.