However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박) 피고인은 2014. 4. 28. 19:15경 화성시 C에 있는 D식당에서 다른 테이블에 앉아 있던 피해자 E(56세)이 “저 새끼가 개 죽은 것 때문에 신고를 했었어.” 라고 말한 것에 격분하여 피고인은 피해자를 “총으로 쏴 죽인다.”라고 말하며 위 식당 밖으로 나가 자신의 차량 안에 있던 흉기인 공기총(총명 : APEX330)을 꺼내어 들었고, 피고인을 따라 나간 피해자의 일행인 F(52세)이 이를 말리면서 총구가 하늘로 향하자 1회 격발하는 방법으로 피해자를 협박하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to E (including theF statement);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant reflects the fact, the fact that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim, and the fact that it is an contingent crime);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 2009Do

1. The non-guilty part of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. A person who is permitted to possess guns shall not use guns except for the permitted use or any justifiable ground;

Nevertheless, the defendant used the air gun, which was under custody after obtaining permission for the use of harmful birds (G) at the time and place of criminal facts stated in the judgment, for the purpose of threatening the victim as stated in the facts of the crime.

2. The principle of no punishment without law requires that crimes and penalties be determined by law in order to protect individual freedom and rights from arbitrary exercise of the state penal authority.

In light of this purpose, penal law is applied.