beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.03.17 2015고단3848

위계공무집행방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2015, the Defendant filed a false report with 112 on the ground that he did not open a door to enter the D’s singing near Gwangju Northern-gu C, and filed a false report with the Defendant that “D’s singing room may not open and open door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door,” and that “D’s singing and door door door door door door door door door door in the E’s restaurant will be employed” around 03:00 on the same day. On the same day, the Defendant filed a false report with the Defendant by telephone around 112 in spite of the fact that he did not run the business.”

As above, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by means of fraudulent means by making several calls from around 02:2 to 03:42, and by making false reports by phone calls at 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The descriptions of L Statements;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case shall be subject to criticism, in light of the pertinent legal provisions as to the crime, Article 137 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (the repeated report of the Defendant was wasted by the repeated report of the Defendant, and the damage caused to the singing room that became the object of a false report).

However, the defendant has a depth of his mistake, and the crime of this case was committed only on September 8, 2015, and later, it appears that the defendant has not been prevented from committing any crime, and the defendant has received education, treatment, etc. for correction of the wrong drinking habits, and has improved it by taking into account the fact that the defendant received education, education, etc. for correction of the wrong drinking habits, and that the defendant has reached an agreement with the sing room side where the damage was inflicted).

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;