1. On July 2, 2016, at around 12:30 on July 2, 2016, the Defendant stolen property by means of the following six methods: (a) including: (b) the Defendant: (c) by creshing the surveillance of the damaged Maart D and braille members in the Maart located in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon; (d) thrown away 12:50 won in total from the calculation unit by settling only the goods equivalent to KRW 6,140, such as tobacco, etc. which can be settled in small amounts of money; and (e) then, (e) thrown away property equivalent to the total amount of KRW 265,50,50 in the market price in the product display unit by using the aforesaid methods, from July 11, 2016, as in the one-year list of crimes, from that time until July 1, 2016.

2. From July 18:10 on July 5, 2016, E, the husband of the Defendant and the Defendant, the husband of the victim and the Defendant, concealed the 40,360 won of the market price in the product display stand by using a gap in the surveillance of the victim and the shop members at the places indicated in paragraph 1, around 18:0 on July 5, 2016, and subsequently, concealed the fluor’s fluor, etc., leading the Defendant, leading the fluor, leading the fluor, leading the fluor, leading the fluor of the fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluorial.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property jointly with E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of a investigation report (to attach photographs by video recording data ofCCTV and capturing a course);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to descriptions of a written reference;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to the facts constituting an offense (abstinence point, choice of imprisonment) and Articles 331 (2) and 331 (1) of the Criminal Act (abstinence point);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Recognition of and judgment on crimes committed by investigative agencies with reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act, which are to be mitigated.