All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court against the Defendant (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable for the lower court to have been sentenced to imprisonment (eight months).

B. The lower court’s sentence against the prosecutor (unlawful in sentencing) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the crime of this case is planned using the Internet site and its nature is not good in light of the circumstances and methods, etc. committed repeatedly against many unspecified victims, and most victims' damages are not recovered. The defendant's mistake is acknowledged, despite the fact that it is against and against the defendant, the amount of individual damage or total damage is not large, and the defendant's age is still young and there is no record of criminal punishment other than the previous fine, and the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. do not seem to be unfair because the court's punishment is too heavy or uneasible. Thus, each argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.