1. Obstruction of business;

A. On January 4, 2018, around 05:40, the Defendant: (a) at the D convenience store located in Busan Shodong-gu, Busan; (b) around 03:30 of the same day, at the above convenience store, the Defendant took a bath to the victim E (31 tax) who is an employee of the said convenience store without any justifiable reason; (c) returned the Defendant to the said convenience store; (d) on the other hand, the police officers dispatched after receiving 112 a report, returned to the Defendant; (c) but (d) found the Defendant at the said convenience store, the Defendant took a bath, such as “the victim would be subject to the imposition of annual taxation, and would bring about no money; and (d) the Plaintiff would be dead and dead.” (d) At around 10 minutes of the disturbance, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force.

B. On the 10:34 of the same month, the Defendant sought to enter into an agreement with the victim F, who is the owner of the business at the above D convenience store on the 10:34 of the same month, but did not reach an agreement with the victim F, who is the owner of the business at that place, on the 10:34.

C. Written Reports to the Police

Whether it is the same as the inside of the Republic of Korea

"Along about 20 minutes of gambling, such as '', a large interest, and sprinking inside the convenience store, the victim's convenience store business was obstructed by force.

2. The Defendant of intimidation 1-b. at the same time and at the same place as above, on the ground that the victim would not refuse and agree to prepare a written agreement even though the victim F was demanded to do so, the Defendant died with knife in the knife by the agreement.

B. A large amount of money and “the victim was threatened with any harm to the victim’s body by speaking several times, as it would inflict any harm on the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The Defendant, for reasons of sentencing in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes, committed the instant crime again during the period of suspension of execution.

There is no agreement with the victim.