beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.06 2012고합223

변호사법위반등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was launched on April 15, 2004 in the election of the 17th National Assembly members and won in the election in the E constituency from May 30, 2004 to May 29, 2008, and the Defendant served as the 17th National Assembly member. From May 30, 2004 to May 29, 2008, the Defendant served as the chairman of the F Party E local constituency from the expiration of the 17th National Assembly member term to the end of August 2010, the Defendant was going to the F Party GDo governor candidate around March 201, and continued to engage in political activities, such as registering and registering as the F Party candidate in the H constituency to go to the 19th National Assembly member election conducted on April 11, 2012.

A. On May 16, 2006, the president of J, the total number of I group violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, was detained in the Seoul Central District Court for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) and was released on June 28, 2006.

The president of the J was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) by the Seoul Central District Court on February 5, 2007 (the first instance court); on September 6, 2007, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of five years and the community service order for the same crime (the first instance court); on April 11, 2008, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the appellate court on April 11, 2008; on June 3, 2008, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of five years and the community service order for three years.

(Reversal) After Reversal, the Defendant was released on July 8, 2006 by K, a general vice-chairperson of the I Group, who received a solicitation that “The Defendant would assist the President in receiving a prior action in the course of the trial by requesting the senior secretary of the I Group to the senior secretary-general of the I Group.”

On August 31, 2007, the Defendant received a request from the above K to the senior secretary in the office of the President and received 30 million won in cash from K in the process of a trial, i.e., the Defendant received 30 million won from K in response to the request from the above K to the senior secretary in the office of the President. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 19650, Sep. 31, 2006>