2. The plaintiffs corresponding to the above revocation part are the defendants.

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”)

(2) The Defendant C is the driver of the FSp-type vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant AS-type vehicle”), which is a traffic accident in which the deceased died, and the Defendant D is the owner of the instant AS-type vehicle as Defendant C’s children.

B. On August 16, 2016, the instant traffic accident occurred. Defendant C driven the instant Maritime Vehicle at around 12:10 on August 16, 2016, and driven the instant Maritime Vehicle with a flow route of 565 industrial roads from the high sea level to the airside, with a flown at the entrance of the non-fluor village in the high sea level, walked to one lane between the two lanes in high sea level and the two lanes in high sea level, while Defendant C driven the instant Maritime Vehicle with a flown speed from the high sea level to the intersection, and driven to the one lane between the two lanes in high sea level (hereinafter “damageed Vehicle”).

2) The part of the front part of the instant damaged vehicle, which did not discover and shocked the front part of the instant damaged vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”).

2) The Deceased died due to the instant traffic accident.

C. On October 18, 2016, the Daegu District Court 2016Kadan126217 decided October 18, 2016 filed a lawsuit against the Defendants and the Intervenor joining the Defendant, the insurer of the instant sea vehicle, seeking the payment of damages for the instant traffic accident (hereinafter “instant damages lawsuit”).

(2) On November 28, 2016, H agreed to the Intervenor’s Intervenor on November 28, 2016, the amount of KRW 310,00,000, including the amount of motor vehicle accident compensation liability insurance (all of the statutory damages, such as death, funeral expenses, loss gains, etc.), including the amount of motor vehicle accident compensation liability insurance, from the Intervenor’s Intervenor, is clearly collected as the amount of damages, and mutually agreed.