except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 재물손괴 피고인은 2015. 9. 19. 19:50경 파주시 C에 있는 피해자 D가 운영하는 ‘E쭈꾸미’라는 상호의 식당 앞 노상에서 술에 취해 식당 현관 앞 상자에 쌓아둔 빈 소주병을 집어 들고 위 식당 유리창에 던져 피해자 소유인 시가 78,000원 상당의 유리창 3장을 깨뜨렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), created a fear of fear by shouldering the glass windows, thereby allowing customers who provided meals in the restaurant operated by the victim to leave the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. 공무집행방해 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시 및 장소에서 위와 같은 이유로 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 파주경찰서 F지구대 소속 경사 G이 피고인을 현행범인으로 체포하자 G에게 욕설을 하며 발로 G의 얼굴을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant statutory provisions of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is erroneously divided, the fact that there is no criminal record for the last ten years, and the victim does not want the punishment by