However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Power of crime] On June 1, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 from the Changwon District Court to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), and on March 9, 2010, the Defendant received a fine of KRW 2,50,000 for the same crime from the Changwon District Court Jinwon District Court, and has violated the provisions on prohibition of drinking under the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On July 29, 2017, the Defendant driven D Poter truck under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.056% without obtaining a driver’s license, from around the mother road of the Defendant located in the Sinnam Development Zone B, to around 6km in the same military C, while driving the D Poter truck under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.056% without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, prior to the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, was discovered by driving alcohol on the roads of the Da, the police box affiliated with the Kambing Police Station E box, and was asked to present identification cards as if he was the Defendant-friendly G, while the Defendant himself given the name and resident registration number of the above G, thereby illegally using another person’s resident registration number.

3. On July 9, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document: (a) around 22:06, at a police box E-a station located in H of the K of the G, the Defendant stated the personal information of the said G when the said F demanded the personal information of the Defendant from the said G; (b) had the said F enter the personal information of G in the instant situation statement report; and (c) submitted the said state driver’s circumstantial statement report to the “ driver” column of the said state driver’s statement report.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the statement report on the situation of the driver's driver in G in the name of G, which is a private document concerning fact certification, and issued it to the above F without knowledge of the fact.

4. On July 9, 2017, the Defendant, such as the electronic records, etc., and the electronic records of the above writers, etc., is portable by the police officer who belongs to the same police box in the same manner and in the same manner as paragraph 3 at around 22:07.