beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.28 2015가단5010199

위자료

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs, around October 2014, decided to lend a set of wails and a set of Does to the back of the back of the wails, which are to be worn at the marriage ceremony scheduled at November 15, 2014 by the Defendant on or around November 4, 2014, without the shouldering of the name of “n”, and have no string lines; hereinafter “this case’s wails”).

(hereinafter “instant loan agreement”). (b)

Plaintiff

A, at first of November 2014, at the Defendant’s waves shop, carried out the instant waves bags at the Defendant’s waves shop, and thereafter, requested the Defendant (including the employees working at the Defendant’s waves shop) to communicate by telephone to the Defendant’s side (the Defendant’s side) to remove the instant waves news.

다. 피고측은 결혼식 당일 오전에 원고들에게 트레인 장식을 제거한 이 사건 웨딩드레스를 전달하였고, 원고 A은 2014. 11. 15. 13시경 메이크업�에서 화장을 하고 이 사건 웨딩드레스를 입은 후 결혼식 도우미인 D에게 드레스가 몸에 잘 맞지 않는다고 불만을 표시하였다. 라.

이에 D는 원고들과 함께 피고의 웨딩드레스�으로 이동하였고, 피고측은 원고들이 도착한 직후 이 사건 웨딩드레스의 지퍼위치를 수정하는 방법으로 이 사건 웨딩드레스에 대한 보정작업을 하였다.

E. Plaintiff A, who completed the correction work, re-entered with Plaintiff B, and started with Plaintiff B to a wedding place, and went through a marriage ceremony at around 15:50,000 at the wedding time.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 3-1 through 10, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 through 4, Eul evidence 3-1 through 21, Eul evidence 3-1 through 21, and the purport of the whole pleadings, witness E, and Eul's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant fulfilled the duty of due care as a good manager and set up the instant wab and so on.