2. In light of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times as a violent crime and murder, but he again committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period and again committed the crime of this case, there is no doubt about the defendant's statement about the circumstances of this case in light of the shape of the victim or the witness's statement, although there is no doubt about the defendant's statement concerning the circumstances of this case. However, above all, the defendant did not want the defendant's statement from the beginning of the investigation and did not want the defendant's punishment, and the degree of the victim's injury is not significant, and the defendant's long life was released at the end of the flood, and the defendant's service was faithfully performed as a waste company's employee, the sentencing of the court below that sentenced the fine is proper.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.