However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a sports cargo vehicle in D amount.

On March 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on March 21, 2018, and moved the front of the Gu E-mail from the front side of the Ka Center in Ansan-si to the road.

At the time, there was a place where a sidewalk for pedestrian traffic was installed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to keep it, and got back to the right side of the victim F, who was coming to the right side of the victim F, coming to the front side of this original intersection from the main direction of the defendant's running in Paris to the right side of the defendant, as the back side of the above cargo.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as external shocks, which require approximately 14 weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Reports on traffic accidents: 1, 2;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part IV of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 9 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the degree of damage is severe, the defendant was not guilty, the victim was rescued immediately after the accident in this case, and the agreement with the victim's family is reached).