2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected, and that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, each of the crimes of this case is highly harmful to society, such as promoting a speculative spirit of the people and impairing a sound sense of work, and has a lot of records that have been punished as a pro rata crime including two times of punishment, and some of the crimes of this case were committed during the suspended execution period due to a special injury, etc., as well as all other circumstances that form the conditions of the sentencing of this case as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate and it is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's improper assertion of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.