However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 23, 2017, the injured Defendant added the Defendant’s written indictment to the victim D (36) who is a taxi driver without any particular reason without the victim’s age, within a taxi parked on the west-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, Daegu, on the ground that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not indicate the victim’s age. However, even if this was added without the amendment to the indictment, it does not seem that the Defendant would have suffered substantial disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’s right of defense. Accordingly, the Defendant

The flabbage was sleeped, and the victim reported 112, and the defendant, who was taken from the taxi, was sleeped with the victim's flab so that he could not escape, and again flab the victim's flab.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as dump dump, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the above date, time, and place after receiving a report at 112, and asked the police officers belonging to the Daegu Northern Police Station E District F. The instant police officers assigned to the site with the instant guards, and the Defendant, “The death of this case was hereinafter referred to as the horns of rhinoceros, and committed assault, such as cutting down the fat of the police officer’s fat, pushing him with b

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. Sentencing 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) No. 1 Crimes (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (In June to one year and six months) in the basic area (Special Sentencing) of the sentencing criteria) No. 2 Crimes (Assault) [Scope of Recommendation)] in the area of special mitigation (one month to one year) in the area of special mitigation (one year from one year) (Special Mitigation Person) (Special Mitigation Person).