Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. On March 15, 200, the Plaintiff (B) was appointed as Staff sergeant in the Navy on June 23, 2004, and was discharged from military service on June 23, 2004. On March 26, 2000, the Plaintiff (B) was subject to an accident where he was faced with motive students during the training course conducted at the training center on March 26, 200 after the officer was subject to the instant accident (hereinafter “accident”).

B. On June 4, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, and was recognized as a military police official on the escape card of a memorial signboard (which is the 3-4, the 4-5, the 5-astronomical trends 1), the cirical frame accompanied by the nephical disease, and other conical and other conical signboards disorder.

(c)

On April 5, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a different pension under the former Military Pension Act (wholly amended by Act No. 16760, Dec. 10, 2019; hereinafter the same). On April 5, 2019, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the pension of different persons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On March 200, the Plaintiff performed the diagnosis of disc escape and several operations on a water surface at the training center. On June 2004, it is confirmed that the Plaintiff performed spin convergence surgery between the 4-5 verted 2016 and the vertebrate convergence surgery between the 3-4 verted 2017 and the vertebrate convergence surgery.

As a result of the physical examination of the military hospital, there have been a crypology, a ppuri path, a ppuri disease, and a radioactive ccephere inverte invertebrate, and the opinions on the reduction of gravity that is not on the right side were confirmed.

As a result of the deliberation council’s determination, the first water point of 200 and the first water point of vertebrate in 200 was not recognized due to the difference between the water point of 2016-2017 to the water point of 2017 and the considerable period of time of operation, and it was determined as a disability due to the change of evacity

Accordingly, it is not possible to recognize a substantial causal relationship between the relevant disease and the military service, and thus it is not recognized as a disease due to official duties.

(d)

The Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Military Pension Benefit Review Committee, but the Plaintiff’s request for review was dismissed on December 2, 2019.

[Ground for recognition] There is no dispute, A.