If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 19, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “D” operated by the victim C on the second floor in the original city B, the Defendant would work as an employee in studal harassment.”

However, the facts did not have an intention to work as an employee of the studio spam.

On January 19, 2013, the Defendant received 6,500,000 won from the victim as a pre-paid payment.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (related to telephone conversations with a complainant);

1. Application of the details of bankbooks and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing cash increase;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.