업무방해등
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendants A and B’s joint criminal acts were committed in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, on September 22, 2015, at around 21:30, 2015, and the victim D’s 2 heading room of “E” operated by the victim D, brea each other’s flab and flabed on the floor, and flabed off the glass of the drinking branch and flab, and flabing the disturbance, thereby avoiding the disturbance, from F, an employee of the said main branch, “Other customers are flabed.”
It was difficult to avoid a disturbance between 30 minutes, such as continuing noise even after the words "".
Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the victim's main business by force.
2. Defendant A1’s property damage at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, as above, the Defendant 42 monitors installed on the wall surface of the State Party F, in which the State Party B and the State Party B were sponsed by the F, an employee of the State Party F, and was accompanied by a monitor and a singing reflector.
Accordingly, the Defendant damaged monitoring and singing machines owned by the victim D to have an amount of 1,150,000 won as repair cost.
2) The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, as seen above, was removed from G, a police officer belonging to the police station patrol group, who was called out after receiving a report of 112, and was called out. B, “Chishing”;
I shall identify.
“In doing so, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Report by assaulting the plastic ice, such as gathering of plastic ice on the table, placing drinking to police officers G, etc.
3. Defendant B was arrested by police officers G as a flagrant offender of interference with his duties upon receipt of a report of 112 who would have avoided the disturbance at the time and place described in paragraph (1), and was transferred to a police officer in charge of the police station-type company and office in the 22:20-ro, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and 259-ro, as the 22:20-ro, the same day.
The Defendant, therefore, arrested G, “I am, I am, I am.”
The snow in the dog, the body of the person shall be discarded, the body of the person who died, and the body of the person.
by heading, ...