beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.26 2015나2051690

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is reasonable to accept the reasoning of this judgment, except for the dismissal or addition.

2. Parts to be removed or added;

A. On the other hand, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the dismissal is deleted from the 3rd and 4th to 6th (Provided, That the plaintiffs are not the plaintiffs).

B. 1) Following the third 3rd page of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the part added" was added to "the part part of the deceased's share of consolation money (80,000 won)" to "3.3. judgment of the court of first instance." The following statements are added to the end of "the judgment of the court of first instance". Meanwhile, the plaintiffs argued that the deceased's employee's mistake in taking emergency measures after the occurrence of the accident caused by the deceased's use in the center of this case, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, there is no evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, the evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, Eul, and No. 1, 2, 6, 7, 19 (including a serial number) were revealed by considering the overall purport of arguments in the above 3rd page of the judgment of the court of first instance. In other words, the defendant's employee reported the deceased's denial of the accident to the deceased by telephone call, and the defendant's 2.

3. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed for lack of reason.