beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.06.01 2018고단91

협박

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who actually operates (ju)B, a reconstruction association implementing company of an apartment.

On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the victim D, who was employed by the head of the headquarters from May 17:5, 2017, from around 112:604, Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, from around 17:59, to around 604, to the head of the headquarters from around January 2016, used the victim’s Handphone (G) using the victim’s Handphone (G) in the victim’s Handphone (G) with the Defendant’s wife’s wife’s wife’s Handphone. If the victim D, who was employed by the head of the headquarters from around 112:604, 2016, did not hold any agreement.

It is known to all the people who are infinite finite finite, and the people believe that the people are not infinite.

The phrase “Isker in excess of Isker than Isker,” which must do so even after Isker, sent the word “Isker.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) the submission of a letter of withdrawal of a complaint on January 23, 2018 (which includes the intent of the board of directors not to punish).

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;