When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was a current or former employee of the Victim C (20) workplace, and the victim was serving military service in D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

person is a person.

1. A special assault: (a) around April 2014, the Defendant: (b) assaulted the victim using a locker, which is a dangerous object, prior to D’s camera washing machines, for the reason that the injured person was not well aware of his work; (c) from that time until September 2014, the Defendant used the locker, which is a dangerous object, three times in total, such as (d) Nos. 3, 5, and 8 of the List of Crimes, from that time, until September 2014.

2. Around December 2013, the Defendant abused the victim on the ground that he was unable to do the work before the Mediology of the above D on the ground that he was unable to do so, and assaulted the victim on a total of eight occasions, such as the victim’s chest at once and once, from January 19, 2015, until January 19, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of the witness C;

1. Recording of each of the witness G and H's statements in the fourth public trial records;

1. Recording of a witness I's statement in the fifth public trial records;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to J

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of special violence and the selection of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of violence and the selection of fines) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant was a former employee of the victim C (20)’s workplace, and the victim was a substitute for military service in D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

person is a person.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 2 times, without any justifiable reason, set the victim’s string off the string of D’s camera E, in light of the fact that the Defendant: (b) had string off the string of the strings; and (c) 3 times.