However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who uses B trads and dyp, a private truck, and a truck for private use of C. 4.5 tons of trucks.

No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

1. On January 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) provided a private truck for transport of cargo at a cost by receiving KRW 60,000 from the transportation fee of KRW 60,00 in front of the Seongdong-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, which was 293, and transporting waste using the said B truck; and (b) provided the truck for transport of cargo.

2. On January 26, 2016, at around 13:00, the Defendant received KRW 700,000,000 from the same ice apartment located in Busan Southern-ro, 104, and received transportation charges of KRW 29,00,00 from the same ice apartment in Busan-ro, and provided a private truck for cargo transport with the above C truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence, each field photograph, each register of motor vehicles registration, accusation, and the details of detection;

1. Selection of a punishment under Article 67 subparagraph 7 or 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act or imprisonment with prison labor for a crime under the relevant provision of the Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that there are several criminal records of the same kind of crime, but there are no records exceeding the fine,