용역비
1. As to KRW 360,800,000 and KRW 311,300,000 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 49,50,000 from June 24, 2018.
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant’s establishment process, etc. 1) B Housing Redevelopment Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “former Promotion Committee”).
A) The housing redevelopment project in the first city C(hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”) is the housing redevelopment project in the first city.
The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) shall be organized to establish an association for the purpose of establishing the association and from the original state market on June 17, 2005.
(2) On December 28, 2010, the former Promotion Committee notified that the former Promotion Committee’s approval was null and void on the ground that the former Promotion Committee’s approval under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas was conducted prior to the designation of a rearrangement zone, and that the former Promotion Committee’s approval was conducted prior to the designation of a rearrangement zone.
3) After notification of the invalidation of approval, D and promoters who were the chairperson of the former promotion committee shall be the Preparatory Committee for Rearrangement Projects for Housing Redevelopment Projects B (the chairperson D; hereinafter “PP Committee”).
(4) On December 18, 2012, the Governor of Gangwon-do continued to carry out the instant redevelopment project-related work under the name of “the instant redevelopment project.” On January 25, 2013, the Governor of Gangwon-do designated and publicly notified an improvement zone for the instant redevelopment project, and the Governor of Gangwon-do approved and publicly notified the topographic map of the improvement zone.
5) On February 27, 2013, the original housing redevelopment project promotion committee approved on February 27, 2013 (hereinafter “promotion committee”).
(6) On August 24, 2013, a promotion committee: (a) held an inaugural general meeting for the establishment of an association; and (b) established a defendant who is an association under the Urban Improvement Act; and (c) obtained authorization to establish an association from the prime city on October 18, 2013.
7. The promotion committee adopted a resolution on the audit report on the expenses incurred in implementing the redevelopment project in this case from January 1, 2004 to June 30, 2013, and the settlement of accounts.
3.2