beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.11.18 2020가합40088

관리단집회결의취소청구

Text

The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is an aggregate building B (hereinafter “instant building”) composed of four underground floors, fifteen floors above ground, and thirty-seven divided stores in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, Dongdong-gu (hereinafter “instant building”).

(2) The Plaintiff is a sectional owner of the instant building D.

B. On March 31, 2019, the Defendant’s custodian E, who was at the expiration of the former custodian’s term of office, called a temporary management body meeting on May 21, 2019 while the latter custodian was not appointed, and a resolution was made to appoint F as a manager at the above management body meeting. (2) As to this, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the said resolution with the Busan District Court 2019Gahap44930, and the said judgment became final and conclusive by rendering a non-litigation judgment citing the above claim on November 14, 2019.

C. A resolution of a temporary management body meeting 1) A, around December 20, 2019, announced the convocation of a temporary management body meeting with the following contents. A resolution of a temporary management body meeting 1: The case of appointment of the head of the management body (manager): December 20, 2019; a written application for registration of candidates and a written recommendation: The registration of candidates: from December 20, 2019 to December 24, 2019: A public announcement of the result of the registration of candidates: A proposal of the change of management body and service company; (i) the case of appointment of the head of the management body; (ii) the case of appointment of the head of the management body; (iii) the case of appointment of the head of the management body; (iv) the case of appointment of the head of the management body; and (v) the case of the temporary appointment of the management body 21: the public announcement of the instant case’s exercise of rights by 201 persons (including the improvement of facilities); and (iv) the case’s request for replacement of rights.

In relation to the agenda item 1, F has filed an application for registration as a sole candidate with respect to the agenda item, the said 17 persons (62.16% of the sectional owners and the area of exclusive voting rights).