도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On September 20, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3.5 million from the Daegu District Court to a fine of KRW 3.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on April 25, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million due to a fine of KRW 3.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
1. Around 00:20 on March 3, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 00:10%, driven a cchip car owned by the Defendant B at a section of about 500 meters from the front of the 103 Enden apartment 103 dong-ro 223, in front of the cafeteria at the cafeteria, a cafeteria located in the Gyeongsung-gu Donsan-dong, Daegu-ro, Daegu-ro, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.10%.
2. On March 3, 2015, the Defendant issued a request for the issuance of a driver’s license on a motor vehicle, following an inspection conducted by the Daegu Suwon Police Station D District Unit of the 112 patrol Police Station, while driving the said franchise at a 103 front parking lot, in Denmark apartment 103, as indicated in paragraph (a).
In this regard, the defendant suggested that the defendant's resident registration certificate B was completed in the name of the Si of Gyeong-do, which is an official document in possession of the defendant, as if the defendant was the resident registration certificate of the defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.
3. Forgery of a private signature;
A. On March 3, 2015, the Defendant entered “B” in the name column for the purpose of exercising his/her signature on a voluntary consent to conduct and a report on the E-rayed driver’s situation in which the Defendant’s identity was stated at the D District Office of the Daegu Suwon Police Station D District Office (hereinafter referred to as the “D”) and signed on the name side of the Defendant’s name.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.
B. At the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant received the Defendant’s resident registration certificate B from the Defendant, and determined the Defendant as B, the slope F, affiliated with the said district unit, connected to the traffic information network to PDA, with B’s personal information.