However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 21, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) intending to fright at the house of the C (B) which had been dead before Gwangju Northern-gu and to use violence against his female; (b) frighted from the police officer E belonging to the Gwangju Northern Police Station D Zone D District, which was called upon upon receipt of a report, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the criminal investigation and the maintenance of public security by using his/her blue with his/her blue with his/her blue at one time, and the face of the said police officer once with his/her blue with his/her hand, and by using his/her blue with his/her blue with his/her hand, and by destroying his/her blue and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of pictures;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence of punishment of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order is to be suspended considering the following favorable circumstances: (a) the scope of recommendations for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: (b) the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended in consideration of the following factors: (c) the scope of recommendations for the suspension of performance of official duties; (d) the mitigation area (i) the police officer’s direct exercise of physical power with regard to police officers; and (e) the election of imprisonment is chosen; and (e)