2. The judgment of the court below and the trial court show the attitude that the defendant has committed a crime in substitution of the court below and the trial court, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and there is a old mother who should support without good health, etc.

However, the crime of this case is extremely poor in the nature of the crime that the defendant was put into a provisional return of game machine and resumed the fraudulent act again, and that there is a need to punish the fraudulent act in order to maintain a sound working environment in the whole society. The sentencing of the court below seems to have taken into account all favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that may differ from the judgment below. In full view of all the circumstances indicated in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character, character and behavior, environment, occupation, power, circumstances of the crime of this case, means and consequence, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.