beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.12.24 2014고단555

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On February 1, 2012, A was sentenced to one year of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in Daegu District Court racing support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 9, 2012.

1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On April 1, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F in G office of the limited partnership company G operated by the victim F located in 107 of the building 107 in the Daesung-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant stated that “Any electrical construction work on the construction site of the He Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri-gu, and KRW 16,500,000 for the electrical construction work on the construction site of the Jeju Hri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri-gu, and would be paid in cash or three-month bill within 60 days after the completion of the construction work.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was awarded a contract for the construction work of the Hari Tri Tri T with no particular funds at the time and received 30% of the construction cost as substitute, and the remainder 70% of the construction cost was paid after 20 months after the completion of the Hari Tri Tri T, and thus, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the construction cost on the agreed date even if the Defendant granted a sub-subcontract to the victim for electrical construction.

From April 1, 2010 to September 7, 2010, the Defendant enticed the victim, and caused the victim to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of KRW 157,911,178 at the site of the new construction of the racing from April 1, 2010 to September 7, 201, and had the victims conduct electrical construction work equivalent to KRW 16,50,000 at the site of the new construction of the Jeju Hriart from April 1, 2010 to July 30, 2010, and did not pay the construction cost equivalent to KRW 174,41,178 at the site of the new construction of the Jeju Hriart, thereby having the victims acquire economic benefits at least three times from that time, such as the statement in the list of crimes (1) from that time to July 9, 2010.

Along on April 1, 2010, the amount of damage caused by the victim's method of crime at the time and place of crime (1) Nos. 1 of the crime list of crimes is electrical construction for the victims of G office G office E located in the Daesung-gu, U.S. E.

참조조문