beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.12.02 2016고단4271

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

1. Defendant A’s fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant C, D, and E shall be punished by each fine of 1,00 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, on March 2016, at the second floor of the commercial building located in the F of the Haju City, had the mind to operate a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name “G”.

Defendant

A from March 24, 2016 to April 7, 2016, three domestic rooms with shower rooms and eight water rooms in the above “G” were installed, and 1.50,000 won was received from the average two customers of the day of finding the place, and notified them to the relevant room, and had female employees Defendant C, D, etc. conduct sexual intercourse.

As a result, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant B served as an employee in the foregoing “G” around March 24, 2016, and aided and abetted Defendant B to assist Defendant B in engaging in commercial sex acts by providing a pre-contracted call from that time to April 7, 2016 in order to assist Defendant B, while having been aware of the fact that he/she arranged commercial sex acts by doing so.

3. Defendant C, while working in the above “G” from April 4, 2016 to July of the same month, received 150,000 won from the average two customers per day of finding the place and provided a sexual intercourse in return.

Accordingly, Defendant C was engaged in sexual traffic.

4. Defendant D, while working in the above “G” from April 4, 2016 to July of the same month, received 150,000 won from the average two customers of the day of finding the place, and provided a sexual intercourse in return.

Accordingly, Defendant D was engaged in sexual traffic.

5. Defendant E paid KRW 180,000 from the above “G” around April 2, 2016, and in return, Defendant E performed a single sexual intercourse with the female employees in a name-free manner.

Accordingly, Defendant E was engaged in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A device for the investigation report (on-site conditions at the time of the red launch), on-site photographs, investigation reports (Attachment to details of sales of credit cards), details of compiled credit cards, and detailed transactions of credit cards;