beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.05.01 2018고단2070

공기호부정사용등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 10, 2018, around 08:30 on March 10, 2018, the Defendant, within the Cdong parking lot in Jeju-si B, without obtaining permission from the Mayor/Do Governor, removed the seals of the car number plates owned by the Defendant by using the tools, and used the above removed number plates for the purpose of exercising the car number plates by attaching them to the front of the cargo vehicle in which the car number plates owned by the Defendant are kept in custody.

2. From the date and time set forth in paragraph 1 to 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) from the place set forth in paragraph 1 to the place set forth in paragraph 1 to the place set forth in paragraph 1, and (b) from the distance set forth in paragraph 1 to the point set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant was operated from the distance set at approximately 80km to the distance set forth in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised his unlawfully used registration number plate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on custody and violation materials;

1. Article 238(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act for the crime; Article 81 subparag. 1, Article 10(2), Article 78 subparag. 2, and Article 71(1) of the Automobile Management Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (trades violating the Automobile Management Act with respect to the unlawful use of air and motor vehicle registration number plates);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all the various circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, circumstances after and result of the crime, etc., in addition to the punishment of a fine for a crime of double-class crime on the grounds of suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which is punishable once, and reflects the fact that the Defendant