However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:30 on October 27, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 from the police officer who found the customer by pretending him/her, and informed him/her as a smuggling, and had him/her enter as a smuggling, in order to have him/her engage in a similar sexual intercourse.

In addition, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business from September 29, 2014 to October 27, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Each photograph;

1. Business registration certificate and real estate monthly contract;

1. Application of investigation reports to the prosecution (Calculation of profits from sexual traffic) and statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., collectively, through the relevant Articles of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Reasons for sentencing under the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Type of Crimes] - Basic area of Type 2 [Scope of Territorial and Recommendations] - Imprisonment with prison labor for six months or more to one year and four months [general person] mitigated elements of imprisonment - No history of criminal punishment (decision of sentence] 40 hours in probation for two years of suspended execution of August 8 - The above sentencing factors and the defendant recognized their mistakes - On the other hand, it is deemed that there is a high risk of recidivism in light of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.