2. The judgment of the Defendants led to each of the instant crimes for the purpose of living, but all of the Defendants repented of their mistakes and did not have any previous criminal records, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

However, in light of the contents of each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendants, the number and mode of the crimes, the frequency and period of each of the crimes, and the total amount, etc., the overall scale of each of the crimes was considerable, and the various other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crimes, the sentencing of the first instance court against the Defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit.