73,766,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

[Defendant B]

1. Defendants A and B were de facto marital couple. From December 11, 2013 to June 30, 2014, Defendant A and Defendant B operated a sexual traffic business establishment with “F” in Seo-gu, Busan, and from July 1, 2014 to January 25, 2015, Defendant A and Defendant B operated a sexual traffic business establishment with “H” in Seo-gu, Busan, from around July 1, 2014 to around January 25, 2015.

On April 18, 2014, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts by having I, who received KRW 70,000 in return for commercial sex acts from an in-house customer and employed as a commercial sex acts woman, arrange commercial sex acts from December 11, 2013 to January 25, 2015, including arranging commercial sex acts.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging commercial sex acts for business purposes.

2. Although Defendant C was aware of the occurrence of sexual traffic, the Defendant was prohibited from introducing or arranging a job, the Defendant, who was a business owner of the “F” as the first policeman on April 2014, introduced the said I to the said I, and introduced the said I from April 18, 2014 to the said I, which had been engaged in sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant introduced and arranged a job to sell sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and C;

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Statement to the prosecution of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to books and liquid transactions inquiries;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 19 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant B and C: Each of the following factors: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the degree of participation and the first offender in relation to Defendant B, and each of the following factors: The degree of participation in Defendant C and the first offender; and the fact that Defendant C is against each other and has

1. Defendant A: Reasons for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Defendant A).