물품대금
1. The defendant's KRW 40 million and about this, 5% per annum from February 15, 2020 to July 28, 2020 to the plaintiff.
1. The fact that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the paper number), the plaintiff is a business operator who supplies feed, etc. to fishing grounds and the defendant is a business operator who operates the farm farm, and the defendant is a business operator who operates the farm farm. The defendant's payment of KRW 80 million on credit to the plaintiff around December 2015, in installments, shall be paid KRW 30 million in the year 2016, KRW 30 million in installments, and KRW 20 million in the year 2017, KRW 20 million in 20 million in the above confirmation, the defendant's name, resident number, address, contact number, and signature are argued to the purport that the defendant was not aware of other than the defendant's name, resident number, address, and contact. However, as long as the defendant's own confirmation is established, the entire confirmation document is acknowledged.
(2) The Defendant is also obligated to pay damages for delay calculated annually from February 15, 2020 to July 28, 2020, the date following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, to October 2019, in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement in subparagraph 1, and the purport of the statement in subparagraph 1, the Defendant’s payment of KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff around October 29, 2016. Thus, as the Plaintiff seeks, the Defendant is obligated to dispute about the existence or scope of the instant payment order from February 15, 2020 to the date following the delivery date of the original copy of the instant payment order, as the Plaintiff seeks.
On the other hand, the plaintiff asserts that around October 29, 2016, the amount of KRW 20 million paid by the defendant to C as the price for the goods that the plaintiff had been previously operated is not the price for the goods specified in the letter of confirmation.
However, the letter of confirmation of this case.