When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 12:20 on April 14, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that the construction site was not paid the construction cost at the construction site of the Hancheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (61 tax , south, and the president of the association) was in charge of the victim D (61 tax , the president of the association). In the construction site, the Defendant: (a) carried out the construction project at the construction site under the management of the victim D (the owner of the right of retention; (b) the construction project is carried out in the possession of the right of retention; (c) the seller of the sale advertising site; and (d) carried out the construction site using the color frame, and damaged the property by cutting the rail rail that was continuously created by the pipes

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. CCTV 켭쳐 사진 및 낙서한 사진 법령의 적용

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order requires the determination of the same sentence as the order, taking into account the following factors: (a) the confession of the accused and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; (b) some of the circumstances of the instant crime may be taken into account; and (c) the health of the accused is not good;