beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.02 2016고단3857

특수협박등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person with an economic surplus equivalent to KRW 200,000,000 per annum interest income of the managing director of D Co., Ltd., and received sexual traffic E, a university student, through mobile phone Messens, from among the women engaged in sexual traffic by using his social status and economic ability.

1. Violation of the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic;

A. On July 18, 2016, around 15:00 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant paid 80,000 won to her female sexual intercourse E in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse.

B. On July 26, 2016, the Defendant paid 800,000 won to the above female sex trafficking at the Iel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and engaged in sexual intercourse by engaging in sexual intercourse.

(c)

around 16:00 on August 4, 2016, the Defendant paid 80,000 won to the above women of sexual intercourse at Gel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and engaged in sexual intercourse, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse.

2. The Defendant, with the knowledge that the victim E (V, 20 years of age) who became aware of the foregoing, was engaged in sexual traffic due to economic difficulties, had the victim maintained the relationship of “phones” with the victim, including, but not limited to, gifting money, precious metals, vehicles, etc., with the victim, while continuing to meet with the victim.

However, in September 2016, when the victim, who had conflictd with the male-gu that had originally returned from the beginning, brought a different case to the defendant, the defendant tried to think that the victim was owned by himself and to monitor the victim, taking advantage of the hedging with the male-gu.

On November 28, 2016, the Defendant exceeded the clothes of the victim on the ground that the said victim had re-explosived a male-child with a secret male-child, and exceeded the victim’s clothes, and led the male-child ward to sound dial-a-a-dial-a-gu to the male-child room by telephone, telephone, and telephone.

“A person suffering from drinking,” and the person suffering from drinking, respectively.