손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 19, 2019 to November 7, 2019 to the Plaintiff.
1. On June 2012, the Plaintiff (1982s and inn) filed a marriage report with Nonparty C (1981s and hereinafter “the Nonparty”) who is her husband. The Plaintiff claimed consolation money as to mental damage on the ground that the Defendant, who had worked in the same workplace as the Nonparty, was livered with the Nonparty, and the Defendant did not have any connection with the Nonparty.
2. Determination
(a) A third party shall not interfere with a married couple's communal living which corresponds to the nature of the marriage, such as causing a failure of a married couple's communal living, by intervening in a marital life of another person;
In principle, a third party’s act of infringing on or impeding the maintenance of a marital life falling under the essence of marriage and infringing on the spouse’s right as the spouse, thereby infringing on the spouse’s right, constitutes tort (see Supreme Court Decisions 2013Meu2441, May 29, 2015; 2013Meu2441, May 29, 2015). Meanwhile, “illegal act” under Article 840 subparag. 1 of the Civil Act should be understood as a wider concept including any unlawful act that is deemed not faithful to the husband’s duty of mutual aid even if it did not reach common sense.
나. 그런데 피고가 소외인과 성교행위를 하였다는 점에 관한 명확한 증거는 없지만, 위와 같이 민법 제840조 1호에서 정한 ‘부정한 행위’라 함은 간통에 이르지는 아니하였다고 하더라도 부부의 정조의무에 충실하지 아니한 것으로 인정되는 일체의 부정행위를 포함하는 보다 넓은 개념으로 보는 파악하여야 하는데, 갑 제2 내지 27호증(가지번호 포함)의 기재 내지 영상과 변론 전체의 취지에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 소외인 휴대폰의 D 메신저 배경 사진이 피고와 소외인이 팔짱을 낀 사진으로 되어 있고 그 밑에'E(피고), 하트 표시, F 피고의...