2. The judgment of the court below has some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was living in custody for a considerable period of time, suffers the quality of the defendant, needs medical treatment due to a shoulder, support for the mother, etc. However, each crime of this case is committed by the defendant without a driver's license. Each of the crimes of this case is committed by the defendant while driving the vehicle according to five lanes from among the six-lane roads without a driver's license and neglecting his duty of care, and it is difficult for the driver and nine passengers of this case to inflict an injury that requires treatment such as about one week and six weeks from the day on which the driver and nine passengers of this case were damaged so that the vehicle can be damaged or repaired, and the degree of the defendant's negligence is considerably heavy, the victim's damage is extremely small, the defendant's damage to the victim's damage is not covered by the liability insurance, the defendant's motive for the crime of this case's injury to the victim, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant did not have been punished by imprisonment with prison labor and an unavoidable force until 20 years prior to the end.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.