A. In order to move A R&D centers located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and A/S centers located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to buildings located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant building”), the Defendant contracted the Plaintiff to remodel the instant building with the following content:

(1) The term “the instant construction contract” means the term “the instant construction project” by adding up all the first, second, and third construction works as shown below. The term “the instant construction contract” includes both the first, second, and third construction contracts; the term “the construction works” refers to the term “the instant construction contract”). The rate of liquidated damages for delay on October 1, 201, 200 on the date of completion of the construction contract (cost separate from value-added tax) on the date of commencement of the construction contract, shall be October 1, 201, 2012, 2/100 of the construction cost per delay daily on December 30, 2012, 200 on January 23, 2013, 2/100,000,000 on January 23, 2013, 2013;

Among the instant construction works, the primary construction is the primary construction and the primary construction is the primary construction.

The primary construction is a tent, wall, floor construction for the extension of the 6th floor to be used as a meeting room by expanding the 1st to the 5th floor and the 6th floor, and the second construction is the remaining construction for the completion of the extension of the 6th floor.

The third construction is the 6th floor room and the 2nd and third floor room.

C. As to the extension and alteration of use of the sixth floor of the instant building, the Defendant obtained approval on February 15, 2013.

The Defendant did not pay KRW 178,000,000 to the Plaintiff out of the construction cost of the instant case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy Facts, entry of Eul's evidence 1 to 3 (including additional numbers), witness E's testimony, witness F's partial testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 178,000,000 won which has not yet been paid out of the contract price.

Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the additional construction work not included in the instant construction contract was carried out at the request of the defendant, and that the additional construction cost and design service cost were paid.