A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with a new environment company that is the owner of a vehicle A, and the Defendant is a company that owns steel structure within 783-24 (hereinafter “instant structure”) in the old-gu, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

B. B around 15:00 on July 30, 2015, while driving a vehicle from 783-24 to Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, there was an accident that shocks the columns of the instant structure (hereinafter “instant accident”).

[Grounds for Recognition: Entry of Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2, and the purport of the whole video and pleading of Evidence No. 2]

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant's damage caused by the accident of this case is only KRW 5,260,702, but the defendant alleged that the amount of damage caused by the accident of this case reaches KRW 73,90,000, and caused the lawsuit of this case.

B. According to the above basic facts, the accident of this case is deemed to have been negligent in violating the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and steering gear while moving the vehicle A, and therefore, the plaintiff is a insurance company of the above vehicle, and is obliged to compensate the defendant for the damage caused by the accident of this case.

⑵ 손해배상의 범위 ㈎ 인정되는 손해배상의 범위 갑 제2호증의 영상, 감정인 C의 감정결과 및 변론 전체의 취지에 의하면, 이 사건 사고로 인하여 이 사건 구조물 중 A 차량이 충격한 철골 기둥 부위에 일부 PE 파형관 찍힘으로 인한 파손 및 콘크리트 표면의 경미한 손상이 발생하였고, 이로 인해 위 철골 기둥 부위의 내부 강도가 저하된 사실, 위 철골 기둥 부위의 손상을 보수하기 위하여는 해당 철골 기둥을 철거한 후 재시공하여야 하며, 그 보수 비용으로 7,858,287원이 소요되는 사실을...