2. In full view of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined, the lower court determined that the victim’s statement, the primary evidence of which was the victim’s primary evidence, is merely a vague trend, and that the remainder of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, which alone led to an indecent act against the victim, cannot be deemed as having been proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt

However, in light of the above circumstances pointed out by the prosecutor in the grounds of appeal, there is considerable doubt that the Defendant would have committed an indecent act against the victim. However, in the instant case where the Defendant consistently denied the crime from the investigative agency, such circumstances alone are difficult to deem that the facts charged in the instant case where the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to find the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

Therefore, the court below's decision of not guilty of the facts charged in this case is justified and it is so decided by the prosecutor as stated in the judgment of the court below.