성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of additional collection, and 3.6 million won) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The crime of this case is a case of arranging commercial sex acts for a period exceeding two months, and it seems that the period of business is not long and that there is no much profit. The defendant does not have the same criminal record and punishment, and the confession of the crime is against the law and supports the wife of the auditor with hearing disability.
B. Meanwhile, in light of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant impact on society, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that there is a need for a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, the Defendant's responsibility is not weak.
In addition, considering all the sentencing factors indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, living environment, details and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the court below is appropriate.
3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.