However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 13, 2014, at around 17:35, the Defendant: (a) entered the said police box in a state of drinking, and, without any justifiable reason, took the Defendant into the said police box; (b) and (c) took the police box in his/her service, and (d) took several baths to the Defendant, “I Chewing fele, dead, and discarded.”

피고인은 귀가를 권고하는 위 경찰관들의 요청에도 계속하여 행패를 부리던 중 순찰근무를 마치고 돌아와 귀가를 종용하는 충남지방경찰청 제1기동대 소속 경위 F에게 다가가 "야, 너 누구냐, 까불지마, 새끼야"라고 욕설을 하며 오른손을 들어 수차례 위 F을 때리는 시늉을 하고, 위 F의 왼쪽 어깨 견장을 잡아 뜯는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning civil petition handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A copy of a police officer certificate;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant reflects his/her mistake in depth, the criminal record, family relationship, occupation, circumstances of the crime, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;