근로기준법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the prosecutor’s gist of the grounds of appeal (unfair sentencing) and the fact that the Defendant did not pay approximately KRW 36,000,000 in total for 15 workers, and the case is not somewhat weak, the lower court’s sentence sentencing KRW 2,00,000 is too uneasible.
2. In full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant recognized a mistake and reflects the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, that substitute payment is deemed to have been made to some workers, and that the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, degree of damage, and circumstances after the crime, even if considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below's punishment is too unfeasible and unreasonable, so the above assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.